Rep. Dan Crenshaw has disclosed 2 buys and 5 sales since Apr 2026

Dan Crenshaw is a Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives for Texas’s 2nd congressional district, first elected in 2018 and serving in Congress since January 2019.( A former U.S. Navy SEAL and retired lieutenant commander, he served from 2006 to 2016 with five overseas deployments, losing his right eye to an IED blast in Afghanistan and receiving decorations including two Bronze Stars (one with Valor) and the Purple Heart.( Crenshaw holds a B.A. in international relations from Tufts University and an M.P.A. from the Harvard Kennedy School of Government.( In the House, he has positioned himself as a national-security-focused conservative, gaining national attention both for his military background and for high-profile media appearances.(

Crenshaw currently serves on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, including the Subcommittees on Health, Oversight and Investigations, and as Vice Chairman of the Environment Subcommittee, and on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where he chairs the Subcommittee on Defense Intelligence and Overhead Architecture, leads the HPSCI Cartel Task Force, and sits on the Central Intelligence Agency Subcommittee.( His legislative work has focused on energy policy, health care, veterans’ issues, and national security, including bills and co‑sponsored measures related to border security and counter-cartel operations, though most have advanced as part of broader Republican policy packages rather than as marquee standalone laws bearing his name.( Under the STOCK Act, his personal financial disclosures and periodic transaction reports have drawn attention from watchdog groups tracking congressional stock trading, including reports noting trades in major technology stocks such as Alphabet (GOOGL), Amazon (AMZN), Apple (AAPL), and Meta Platforms (META); public scrutiny has centered on the broader debate over whether members of Congress—particularly those on key committees with access to sensitive information—should trade individual stocks at all, rather than on any formal finding of STOCK Act violations in his case.(

Written by Perplexity from public sources.